In “top down” processing, when we look at something, we know what to expect, and we fill in the blanks.
When we see a pen, we glance at it, recognise it and if we need to write, we grab it.
If the pen is in a drawer alongside other pens, pencils and rulers, we have even more “context,” which means we are even more certain about how we perceive it.
Usually this works out.
In this model of perception, we have the world view (based on memories and past experiences) that guides us.
By “filling in the blanks” this method streamlines our decisions and we save energy.
The thing is, we also have a world view of who we are. A “narrative” of what we are good at, and where we are limited.
When we enter a situation, we quickly look for supporting evidence of this to maintain it.
So, what does it look like to “try on” other views that might help us?
When we “try on” a context of being “generous,” or being “kind,” similar to the pen, we then look for supporting evidence to fill in the blanks.
“Top down” means that the narrative leads. It influences how and what we see.
Often, when we get stuck in a rut, perhaps we’re simply reverting to an old habit of choosing a narrative or world view of ourselves that isn’t helping.
What’s it look like to “try on” something else?
